Challenges of digital evidence in the protection of personal data: The chain of custody
Published 2026-03-07
Keywords
- data protection,
- digital evidence,
- justice protocols,
- personal data,
- chain of custody
How to Cite
Copyright (c) 2026 María Augusta San Martín Andrade, Shantal Ruth Bravo Moreno, Christian David Garza Lomas

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International License.
Abstract
This document analyzes the efficiency of processes in the handling of digital evidence as part of the chain of custody in criminal proceedings, as well as the need to ensure the care and protection of personal data, which is susceptible to easy alteration during handling. Therefore, this document analyzes several essential points from an analytical and legal dogmatic methodology, such as: first, the effectiveness of institutional protocols in accordance with existing regulations on the chain of custody, as well as periodic updates of manuals and custody procedures, observing the possible difficulties or limitations encountered in such development. Second, it analyzes whether the regulations governing chain of custody processes and the rights they guarantee have evolved in line with the growing
chain of custody processes and the rights they guarantee have evolved in line with the growing development of technology and the digital elements that must be safeguarded. Finally, through case studies, it analyzes the impact that a break in the chain of custody can have, both in terms of affecting the right to defense and generating impunity.
Similarly, conclusions are drawn based on the bibliographic evidence from the doctrinal and legal research, and relevant recommendations are proposed in order to address possible shortcomings detected in the practical application of the chain of custody of digital evidence and the handling of personal data.
Downloads
References
- Asamblea Constituyente (2008). Constitución de la República de Ecuador. Registro Oficial 449 de 20 de octubre de 2008 (Ecuador).
- Asamblea Nacional del Ecuador (2014). Código Orgánico Integral Penal. Registro Oficial Suplemento 180 de 10 de febrero de 2014. https://www.defensa.gob.ec/wp-content/uploads/downloads/2021/03/COIP_act_feb-2021.pdf
- Ayleth, O., Yuleisy, V. y Nivicela, L. (2024). La Impunidad por Violentarse la Cadena de Custodia por parte de la Policía Nacional. Ciencia Latina Revista Científica Multidisciplinar, 8(2), Article 2. https://doi.org/10.37811/cl_rcm.v8i2.11208
- Corte Nacional de Justicia del Ecuador. (2019). Sentencia No. 17721-2016-01330. https://www.defensoria.gob.ec/wp-content/uploads/2023/03/Sentencia-17721-2019-00013-Aurelio-Quito-Corte%CC%81s.pdf
- Espinales, J. (2023). Análisis del derecho procesal y los entornos jurídicos Analysis of procedural law and legal environments. Revista Científica Arbitrada de Investigación en Comunicación, Marketing y Empresa REICOMUNICAR, 6(12), 89-97. https://www.reicomunicar.journalgestar.org/index.php/reicomunicar/article/view/263
- Imaicela, J. y Alvarado, L. (2024). La incorporación de la prueba digital en el derecho procesal ecuatoriano [Número extraordinario]. Revista Lex. Volumen, 7(27), 1338–1350. Universidad Bolivariana del Ecuador. https://www.revistalex.org/index.php/revistalex/article/download/347/896?inline=1
- International Organization for Standardization. (2012). ISO/IEC 27037:2012. Tecnologías de la información: Técnicas de seguridad: Directrices para la identificación, recopilación, adquisición y preservación de pruebas digitales (1.ª ed.). ISO. (Revisada y confirmada en 2018). https://www.iso.org/standard/44381.html#:~:text=ISO%2FIEC%2027037%3A2012%20provides,can%20be%20of%20evidential%20value.
- Mena, G., y Reinoso, H. (2025). La cadena de custodia en el sistema penal acusatorio ecuatoriano: Retos y propuestas de mejora. Arandu, 12(3), Artículo 1615. https://doi.org/10.69639/arandu.v12i3.1615
- Merino, J, y Gómez de la Torre, G (2024). Cadena de custodia: Valoración de la prueba y tutela judicial efectiva en el proceso penal acusatorio. Ciencia Digital , 8 (2), 36-63. https://doi.org/10.33262/cienciadigital.v8i2.2966
- https://www.cienciadigital.org/revistacienciadigital2/index.php/CienciaDigital/article/view/2966
- Morante, L., Safadi, J., y Gómez, G. (2025). Delitos informáticos y prueba digital en el COIP: validez, cadena de custodia y pericia forense en el Ecuador. Tesla Revista Científica, 5(2), Artículo e542. https://doi.org/10.55204/trc.v5i2.e542
- Servicio Nacional de Medicina Legal y Ciencias Forenses. (SNMLCF) (2025). Manual de actuación para la recolección, preservación, tratamiento y análisis del contenido digital (Código CSEIIMLCF-MLCF-MAN-2025-002, Versión 1.0). Recuperado de https://www.cienciasforenses.gob.ec/wp-content/uploads/2025/08/Manual_ED_Final_julio_signed-signed-signed-signed-signed-signed-signed-signed-signed-signed-signed-signed-signed-signed-signed-signed.pdf